Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 26,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm
Jewel v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:58 pm
State and Misskelley v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
In light of that analysis, the Court found Business’s transactions not to have constituted a sale or use under § 11-102(a), and not to be liable for sales tax in the audit period. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 4:02 pm
Where an ad is literally false, the court has the power enjoin the use without reference to the impact of the ad on the buying public (McNeil-PCC v Bristol-Myers Squibb)(1991)). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
He held that, given that the children themselves were pleaded as victims of discrimination in this case, it was relevantly different from the previous benefits cap case, and their rights should be construed in light of the UNCRC “which identifies the level of consideration which should have been given to their interests before subjecting their households to the revised cap” [76]. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
In light of this, the third month was attributable to Crown delay. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
Thus, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, a rational fact finder could conclude that defendant acquired the video and exercised control over it and the images (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:04 pm
Robert Murray v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:45 pm
In State of Oregon v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 11:07 am
The statute is anything but clear, especially when viewed in the light of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
In January, it was a seven-year long trade mark battle between L’Oréal v eBay before the UK courts (and the CJEU) that bit the dust. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:46 am
In Tyagunova v Russia, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has scrutinized an investigation of rape allegations in Russia. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:02 am
Cross-reference:Air Measurement Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:30 am
And trial lawyers, like state attorneys general, will forum shop. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
September 27, 2017 - 2 PM: RxD Media, LLC v. [read post]
