Search for: "State v. Save" Results 3641 - 3660 of 11,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Rule in Clibbery v Allan In a sense, the case of Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45, [200] Fam 261, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] 1 FLR 565 confirms my point; and it represents the common – (judge-made) – law, which cannot be overturned by a rule-maker. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 6:24 am by John Rubin
Justice Newby of our Supreme Court discussed the movie’s criminal law implications in his concurring opinion in State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:45 pm by Kathryn Rubino
v=yWP6Qki8mWc * Yup, this is how the President of the United States used his Twitter account in 2017. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by ASAD KHAN
The economic aim of saving money was flimsy because responsibility was transferred from one part of Government to another. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Yuval Shany
The Israeli High Court of Justice’s Dec. 12 decision in Abu Ghosh v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
The court supported this argument with a citation to United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:22 am by Andrew Weber
H.R.1275 – World’s Greatest Healthcare Plan of 2017 H.R.4585 – Save Net Neutrality Act of 2017 H.J.Res.69 – Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior relating to “Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska”. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the court observed that the FLSA’s savings clause expressly permits states to provide workers with more beneficial minimum wages and maximum workweeks than those mandated by the FLSA itself. [read post]