Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
On March 4, 2014, the United States Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, expanded the protections offered to whistleblowers under anti-fraud laws, in Lawson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In an earlier Second Circuit case, where the court only touched on the issue in dictum, then-Judge Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, stated that RFRA’s language leads to the conclusion that it could only be applicable in suits involving the government. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:56 am
United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:56 am
United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:58 pm
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:11 pm
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:11 pm
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:09 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:09 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am
As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:53 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
Lord Toulson adopted the reasoning of Sotomayor CJ in King v American Airlines (see discussion below), and held that the quality of the cause of action was irrelevant: the Montreal Convention was designed comprehensively to deal with air carriers’ liability from the moment of embarkation until disembarkation. [read post]
SOX Whistleblower Protection Extends to Employees of Private Contractors, According to Supreme Court
6 Mar 2014, 2:26 pm
Lawson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm
Plain English summary: The Court’s decision in BG Group plc v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:41 am
After the December oral argument in Lozano v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Justice Scalia wishes the court had expressed no opinion about expressing no opinion
5 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
The case is Wednesday’s Rosemond v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:45 am
Lawson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 1:47 pm
The 7-2 majority opinion in Chadbourne & Parke, LLC v. [read post]
