Search for: "State v. Tolle"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 3,685
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2007, 12:53 am
OMRDD worker registry Last Act: 02/26/07 referred to mental health
LAW / CORRECTNSA5911
Tedisco (MS) -- Requires department of motor vehicles to provide police officers with information on level 3 sex offenders based on license or registration inquiry BLURB : V & T L. level 3 sex offenders Last Act: 02/26/07 referred to transportation
LAW / CORRECTNSA5944
McDonough (MS) -- Requires school bus stops not to be located near the residences of sex offenders BLURB : Ed L.… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:36 am
Last Act: 03/01/07 advanced to third reading cal.74
LAW / CRIM-PROCA4306A
Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation necessary to implement the public protection and general government budget for the 2007-2008 state fiscal plan BLURB : 2007-2008 PPGG budget Last Act: 02/26/07 amend (t) and recommit to ways and means02/26/07 print number 4306a
LAW / CRIM-PROCA4308A
Budget -- Enacts major components of legislation necessary to implement the health and mental… [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 11:52 pm
Per S.J. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
Trapp v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
If one class of proteins has more activity than the other class, an abnormal state exists and a person becomes either at risk of excessive clotting (thrombosis) or excessive bleeding. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
In SEC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
Ask not for what the bell tolls, it tolls for punitive damages being assessed through "representative" litigation such as class actions. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 3:49 pm
While a Malicious Prosecution based suit's statues of limitations may be tolled by the case of Heck v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
AEDPA says that the limitations period is tolled while "an application for State postconviction review" is "pending. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 12:56 pm
However, this Court generally refers to state-law tolling rules, e.g., Hardin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 4:30 am
In LAWRENCE v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 7:03 am
That "tolling period," the Court said, only applies when a post-conviction challenge is pending in state courts. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:32 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:14 am
Petitioner's state habeas was ultimately deemed untimely by the California Supreme Court, and so he not entitled to tolling for the time his untimely petition kicked around state court before the final decision. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 9:00 am
Stores v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 10:48 am
The first, USA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 12:55 am
United States, 546 U.S. 12 (2005); Kontrick v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
See Blain v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
LEXIS 79861 [stayed until May 2007]) or deferred ruling on the issue (e.g., Toll v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:30 pm
I'm fairly confident that Judge Kleinfeld gets this one right, and that Jose Valeriano -- a 34-year old Mexican national with three United States citizen children -- isn't entitled to equitable tolling, and hence can and will (and, legally, should) be deported to Mexico. [read post]
