Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 3641 - 3660 of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As long as people are consuming work as she conceived it, doesn’t matter how people are perceiving it—in person, by projector, etc. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 am by Francesca Procaccini
This last point brings up an important caveat: it is not even clear if the alternative of having Apple unlock the phone is technologically possible. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Asheesh Agarwal
We have devoted significant portions of our careers to protecting consumers and competition and we continue to care deeply about the agencies and their mission. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:18 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Greater protection for life insurance proceeds payable to trusts: In 2012 I wrote here about the Morey v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:00 pm by Jean Braucher
The Arizona Supreme Court currently has under review a mortgage documentation case, Vasquez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:57 am by William Carleton
” Is it not apparent that the Commission is being co-opted, that consumers are being told that the Company is your willing partner in an active, ongoing effort to protect the public? [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
 . prices" in another state, and thus "deprive[d] businesses and consumers in other States of 'whatever competitive advantages they may possess' based on the conditions of the local market. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am by Abbe R. Gluck
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, it’s “a scalpel rather than a bulldozer. [read post]
7 May 2011, 2:40 am by Jeff Gamso
would have to give up detaining people forever just 'cause they wanna.And we can't have that. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 11:05 am by James Innocent
It was argued that the restaurant had violated this consumer protection statute by serving Mr. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
 According to Deanna, he “was `between myself and any exit other than the windows and he wouldn't let me pass. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
Starbucks didn’t and is not taking any legal action and the pop up shop has been dissolved, so this discussion is purely hypothetical. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:17 am by Christian Stegmaier
If you don’t know or aren’t sure about what to do, consult a capable lawyer to provide you with this advice.Christian Stegmaier is chair of Collins & Lacy’s Retail/Hospitality/Entertainment Liability Group. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:10 pm by David
Wrath is consuming and destructive. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 25 October 2022, the appeal against the summary judgment granted in favour of the respondent that dismissed the appellant’s defamation claim in ZOLLO v THE COMMISSIONER FOR CONSUMER AFFAIRS [2022] SADC 126 was dismissed. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by Jenny Gesley
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council that commercial free speech enjoys First Amendment protection. (425 U.S. 748 (1976)). [read post]