Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR" Results 3641 - 3660 of 4,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2011, 3:06 pm
 It was no surprise to the IPKat, therefore, when his friend Roland Mallinson (Taylor Wessing) just happened to wonder whether the readers of this weblog might be interested in a recent decision of the OHIM Board of Appeal in Case R 355/2009-2 Fortress Investment Group LLC and Fortress Investment Group (UK) Ltd v Fortress Participations BV, a decision of 8 March 2011 which, at the time of checking, was not yet available online -- but you can read it here. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
He has since received a neat little summary of the decision from his friends at Taylor Wessing, which he has gratefully posted after his own piece here. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Conor McEvily
  At this blog, Professor Steve Vladeck analyzes Elgin v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm by Alfred Brophy
 One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
The judge, Justice Bennett, considered the application utilising the principles laid down by Gummow and Hayne JJ in Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 at [65], quoting Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 618 at 622-623 (per Kitto, Taylor, Menzies and Owen JJ), and accordingly asked whether the plaintiff had: (1) made out a prima facie case; and (2) addressed where the balance of convenience lay? [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am by Ronald Collins
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]