Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 3641 - 3660 of 55,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am by CMS
Professor Rachael Mulheron, a leading commentator on this topic, has described the Markt judgment in her 2004 book The Class Action in Common Law Legal Systems as requiring “class members to show that issues of fact and law were identical between them. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm by Curtis Bradley
   It is sometimes suggested that the Supreme Court’s 1920 decision in Missouri v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 2:18 pm
Hundreds of law students from across the country have added their names to the growing list of people calling for the repatriation and fair trial of Omar Khadr, as well as the closure of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility where he is currently held. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In discussing the best interests of the child in Young v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:35 am by Darryl Brown
., more market-oriented v. more social welfare and market-coordinating) do relative to each other in terms of economic growth and other measures of wellbeing.  Related literature explores the effect of different legal systems on national economic growth and other policy indicia.  Some work is more specific, looking at, say, regulation of public firms or capital markets.  Other work looks more broadly as common law v. civil law legal systems; the… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
The court determines that the plaintiffs “fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked,” per Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm by Zachary Spilman
” Nash, slip op. at 13 (citing United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:23 pm
  Which holds, in a split opinion, that even though the Unfair Competition Law permits a district attorney to bring a lawsuit in the name of the People of the State of California (and obtain relief on behalf of everyone injured), the law doesn't actually do that, and a local DA is instead limited to civil UCL claims in its own jurisdiction.There's something to be said for the majority view. [read post]