Search for: "Thomas" Results 3641 - 3660 of 66,681
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm by Howard Bashman
The post “Justices Who Benefited From Affirmative Action May Decide Its Fate; Supreme Court’s Thomas and Sotomayor were aided by such programs and look back on them very differently” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Quinney College of Law) has posted The Evolution Of Open Source Biotech - From Liberty To Justice (Forthcoming in A Human-Centered Approach to Health Innovations (Lisa Biersay, Thomas Pogge, Peter Yu, eds., Cambridge Univ. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
They declined to do so, but Justice Clarence Thomas penned a brief dissent from the denial of review, joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:32 am by Howard Bashman
Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP, No. 22-914, Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissent, in which Justices Neil M. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Justice Gorsuch wrote a concurrence in the judgment for himself and Justices Thomas and Barrett. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Seán Binder
Barnes and Thomas Gibbons-Neff report for the New York Times. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Research and Resources Maugo, Francis, Towards a More Vibrant and Independent Media Industry in Kenya: The Need for Urgent Policy Recommendations for the Future (2023), Independent Friedman, Mark, Freedom of Expression and Administrative Adjudication: What Ward Tells Us (2023) Centre for Free Expression Keck, Thomas M., Free Speech in an Age of Democratic Backsliding (2023), International Journal of Constitutional Law Senftleben, Martin, Generative AI and Author Remuneration (2023),… [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:14 pm by Josh Blackman
I noted earlier that Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, and Barrett concluded that a statute prohibited the issuance of an injunction in this case–thus the states suffered an injury that the courts could not redress. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by Josh Blackman
Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, and Barrett found that the plaintiffs lack standing on redressability grounds. [read post]
” Justice Clarence Thomas concurred, criticizing the judicial doctrine of overbreadth, writing, “This case demonstrates just how far courts have drifted from their original station of adjudicating the rights of the parties before them in accordance with law. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 2:08 pm by Karen Pita Loor and Cassidy Heverling
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority, in a decision joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
Such calculus underlies the distinction between Gorsuch and Thomas' opinions. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Mike LaChance
“It is no coincidence that several organizations smearing Justice Thomas are funded generously by many of the same donors” The post ProPublica And Activist Groups Attacking Clarence Thomas Share Same Funders first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]