Search for: "United States v. Brown" Results 3641 - 3660 of 4,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 5:41 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Board of Education.In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:21 pm by Joe Mullin
Schreiner said the Court had “launched the United States Patent System into the Information Age with the Bilski v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am by Kashmir Hill
That’s because, according to GLR, “the case marks the first time in the United States that a DNA search technique known as familial searching has led to an arrest in a homicide case. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm by lawmrh
Constitution, “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
United States—the “honest services” case—has “no impact whatsoever” on its prosecution of Ring. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm by brooks
   The Sweatt v Painter decision was then a linchpin in the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision of Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm by Rumpole
The rate of firearm deaths among kids under age 15 is almost 12 times higher in the United States than in 25 other industrialized countries combined. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
While the rest of the world has its eyes trained on the United States, desperately seeking first sight of In re Bilski, patent litigation is still taking place elsewhere, as is evidenced by last week's carefully-framed decision in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Arnold (Patents Court for England and Wales).Right: the IPKat is all in favour of dressings that don't press on his earsThis… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
London Commodity Brokers (1709 Blog) Did Mr Gordon Brown love secret patents? [read post]