Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 4,036
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am
We have no intention of wading into the treacherous (and heated) debate about Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
Following the emails’ release, more than 1,700 scientists from the United Kingdom signed a statement responding “to the ongoing questioning of core climate science and methods. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:15 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:13 pm
Supreme Court opinion in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:00 pm
In a Statement of Interest filed with the court on February 4, the Justice Department said: “Although the United States believes the parties have approached this effort in good faith and the amended settlement agreement is more circumscribed in its sweep than the original proposed settlement, the amended settlement agreement suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement: it is an attempt to use the class action mechanism to implement forward-looking… [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:05 am
PERB reverts to its earlier “past-practice” analysis in determining “unit work”Matter of Manhasset Union Free School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:01 am
At the same time that the Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The following is an opinion piece on the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:26 am
" Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has likewise stated that "Roe v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
The impact of this litigation has arguably been greatest in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:34 am
Here's the relevant language of the MCA: No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Last week, in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:18 pm
Flurries of comments similar to the title of this entry made their way around the Internet today, after the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:53 am
Shipley wrote you a letter that said your travel is "not in the interests of the United States," you stayed put. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 8:33 pm
For the first time, the Supreme Court of the United States will consider how much Constitutional protection text messages are entitled to receive. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and parts of McConnell v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:38 am
" In upholding the ban, the Court undermined a core principle of Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
Based in Chicago and Oak Brook, Ill., we represent clients throughout Illinois, the Midwest and the United States. [read post]
