Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 3641 - 3660 of 24,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 am
Consequently, Gunter contests only the search of his data files conducted in the United States by U.S. officials.U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:50 pm
 The petitioner pointed out that the United States is different and that it would be difficult to define "technology based" in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm by Michael O'Hear
As I discussed in a recent post, the United States Supreme Court left many questions unanswered in its two recent decisions on life without parole for juveniles. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:28 pm
” (The law provides that “[f]or purposes of … certification of nationality, or issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of Jerusalem, the Secretary shall, upon the request of the citizen… record the place of birth as Israel. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
   In fact, the United States Fifth Circuit previously determined that the same exact gambling boat, the M/V Crown, was not a vessel. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
United States did the Supreme Court find any authority in the “Times, Places and Manner” clause to regulate pre-election campaigning. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm by Wells Bennett
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 7:14 am by Dennis Crouch
  Intellectual Ventures sued HP for patent infringement in 2021 for infringing its United States Patent No. 6,779,082. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:58 am
Madison — as quoted in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:11 am by JB
Nevertheless, Chief Justice Roberts has placed in the United States Reports an important enhancement of the distinction between matters of public and private concern that may lead to important new doctrinal developments in the area of personal privacy in the future. [read post]