Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 6,814
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
The states’ briefs on the marriage question Michigan, a state that last year persuaded the Supreme Court to leave it to the state’s voters to choose to ban the use of race in public university admissions (Schuette v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:54 am
., v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
Hodges) and Tennessee (Tanco v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
She’s seemed, and to some degree remains, the most confusing candidate in the Group V race. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
As you may know, a similar issue arose in Trinity Western University v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:05 am
Whatever the outcome of the Coral Gables Commission Group V election, I think we’ll all owe Jeannett Slesnick thanks for setting the agenda. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Natural Resources Defense v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 6:59 am
Ariel Fernandez is the alphabetically first candidate for Coral Gables Commission Group V. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Jonathan Nash suggests that two words in Armstrong v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:32 am
(See Jonathan Haidt for a more complete explanation of conservative v. libertarian mindsets.)The Seattle Post-Intelligencer has a feature on Paul's stands on issues. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:00 am
Late in the March term, the Illinois Supreme Court answered this question in Jackson-Hicks v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:47 am
League of Women Voters.) [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:38 am
League of Women Voters, challenge to the state’s election law. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
The worst feature of the Constitution is Article V itself, which not only makes significant amendment near impossible, but, perhaps as importantly, infantilizes our discourse by making any suggestion of constitutional reform sound utopian and quixotic, not the kind of thing that persons who want to be thought “reasonable” would ever suggest. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 12:36 pm
Especially when that issue is combined with a municipal requirement that the official proponent's name appear on the initiative petition circulated to voters. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:00 am
Woodel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
<> The Hopi Tribe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
For example, in discussing Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:23 am
THE PEOPLE V. [read post]
