Search for: "WEEKS v. WILLIAMS"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 4,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
The shares might have been sold the next day (or a week later), before the market knew about the fraud. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 7:31 am
The "reasonable expectations" of minority shareholders as to continued employment and continued stock ownership were the issue in Vernon v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:29 am
Williams, No. 08-12360, 2009 WL 624073 (11th Cir., Mar. 12, 2009); U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
The Court, following up on its ruling last week in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:52 am
Williams, No. 07-0205, out of Fort Worth (DB) Intercontinental Group Partnership v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
As I discussed here, the Delaware Supreme Court recently decided Wood v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
Osborne, William G. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:40 pm
See Colon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 1:50 pm
See Randall v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 2:34 am
Long before the Ruiz v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
" Williams, 549 U.S. at 356-57. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
Williams was convicted in 2004 of covering up his complicity in the shooting of his limo driver, but the jury deadlocked on a reckless homicide charge. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 4:23 pm
Marbury v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:39 am
_trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.ca1.uscourts.gov');">Noonan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:01 am
Sampson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Last week, on behalf of sixty corporate and securities law professors from thirty-eight law schools around the country, I filed an amici curiae brief in the case of Lucian Bebchuk vs. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:35 am
This week, in Williams, the court holds that the relationship test is also met “because Williams committed a series of theft offenses against the same store with the same scheme or plan. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 10:39 am
The California Court of Appeal (Second District, Division Three) issued this published opinion last week, reversing a $15 million punitive damages award in a legal malpractice action brought by Tae Bo creator Bill Blanks against the law firm Seyfarth Shaw and one if its partners, William Lancaster.The opinion doesn't contain any analysis of punitive damages issues per se, because the court found that the entire judgment had to be reversed due to instructional errors committed… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Supreme Court case construing the act, Sosa v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: England and Wales High Court holds employee-inventor entitled to ‘fair share’ compensation: Kelly and Chui v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP Spotlight) (Out-Law) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (IPKat) (IAM) USPTO roundtable on deferred examination – reports and analysis (Inventive Step)… [read post]
