Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 3641 - 3660
of 6,235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
On remand, the defendants again moved for summary judgment, which was granted by Judge Crotty in its entirety last week. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:14 pm
Without something concrete to decide, a court won't get involved.Here is a list of non-compete cases that discuss this issue, with the recent New Jersey decision from last week being of particular interest.Stryker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
She expressly states he may have injured her, albeit innocently. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:34 pm
A little over a week ago, Justice Antonin Scalia turned 75. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
To be sure, Obamacare subsidies in federal-exchange states were taking place before the Court affirmed their validity in King v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:33 am
In, DC Comics v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 5:39 am
†to “Miss Smith, what was the holding in Terry v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 2: United States v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm
A few weeks ago the Supreme Court handed down an important yet under-noticed case, Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
B&B Hardware v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 8:40 am
Fifty-five years later, the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:08 pm
Marshall v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:41 am
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 11:06 am
But Hibbs said a case styled Holder v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
will be decided this week, this time by the European Patent Office in Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2010] EWCA Civ 33. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 8:55 am
In Cardenas v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
Care in construction could put the lawyers like me out of business. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Russell v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In my initial post on the health care decision, I stated “Once again, the Chief has manipulated the doctrine of constitutional avoidance to do what he wanted to do in a high profile, important case.” I hadn’t had a chance to go back and expand on this issue since I wrote that, but Nicholas Rosenkranz’s very smart post has prompted me to do so. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:40 pm
Junior partner enlists associate who promptly types away that in the case of Smith v. [read post]
