Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells" Results 3661 - 3680 of 4,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
  Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), the vehicle's titled owner and lessor, the vehicle's driver, and the vehicle's registered owner, American Transit, Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
., a former owner and operator of the site; Tyco Healthcare Group, also former owner and operator; as well as BIM Investment Corp. and Shaffer Realty Nominee Trust, the current owners. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Section 21F(c)(2) sets forth other persons not eligible to receive awards.75 Section 21F(h)(1)(C).76 Section 21F(h)(1)(B)(iii).77 Section 934 of the Act, adding § 15(u) to the 1934 Act.78 Section 935 of the Act, adding § 15(v) to the 1934 Act.79 Section 922(c)(2) of the Act, adding 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In this brief essay, I try to draw some connections between the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am by Matthew Scarola
’” Coverage of the Court’s recently decided cases continues as well. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:25 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
[U]nlike typical restrictive covenants, upon which a prospective employee's position may depend, there were no consequences attached to [the employee]'s refusal to accept the agreement. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:02 am by Andrew Dickinson
Case C-414/92, Solo Kleinmotoren v Boch [1994] ECR I-2237), and (3) identification of the law(s) to be applied in determining the preclusive effect of the class action judgment or court approved settlement (cf. [read post]