Search for: "Application of Smith" Results 3661 - 3680 of 7,622
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 1:33 am by Lindsay Griffiths
., Global Director of Client Value, Reed Smith, LLP D. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Smith (1990), which held that the Free Exercise Clause generally did not require religious exemptions from generally applicable laws (though it left room for many statute-by-statute exemptions). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 3:50 am
Examining Attorney Rebecca Smith relied on a number of third-party registrations the covered wine and other alcoholic beverages, but applicant pointed out the none of the registrations included the specific goods identified in the cited registration. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Smith, as well, where a Native American Church member happened to be the losing claimant) — then we see that Christians had a 1-0 record and non-Christians had a 2-0 record. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am by Rory Little
Smith; and that (3) his attorney had ineffectively argued in closing that “I feel like I ought to just sit down,” because if the jury chose a death sentence, “I can’t quarrel with that” – referred to as a “Spisak error” after the Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Lady Smith rejected the application, expressing the view that the debate is just one part of the broadcasters’ coverage, and that the impartiality rules could be met by giving coverage elsewhere in the television schedule ([2010] CSOH 56). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:18 pm
The venue: the London office of Reed Smith; the subject: whether the protection of copyright extends to cover smells and perfumes. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:12 am
I believe the law was correctly summarized by Smith, J. in Stav v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 We had posts about this decision from Gabrielle Guillemin and Graham Smith. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:53 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Ultimately, courts, legislatures and rulemaking authorities will have to decide the thorny issues on Windsor’s retroactive application. [read post]