Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 5,021
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 9:46 pm
Readers interested in both the death penalty and the reception of international law in domestic legal systems will no doubt be familiar with the case of Garcia v Texas. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm
The Per Curiam Opinion (from the Chief, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, obviously) in Leal Garcia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
Read People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
In the matter of Lux v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
(1) I start with McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:20 am
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3.R. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm
In Guttman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
Supreme Court in Gregg v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
(Shumsky v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:42 am
., v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has issued its ruling in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
Truly, our society barely bats an eye at sick and depraved violence. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:22 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:43 pm
Briefly: Sentencing Law and Policy Blog has coverage of the “barely won” victory (vote of four-one-four) for the petitioner in Freeman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:31 am
(United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Bullcoming v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:47 am
As to statistics, the Court stated that "merely showing that Wal-Mart's policy of discretion has produced an overall sex-based disparity does not suffice," but rather there must be a demonstration of a specific employment practice "other than the bare existence of delegated discretion. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
The Washington Post, what one wag dubbed Rakofsky v. [read post]
