Search for: "C/T"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 50,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2014, 8:46 pm
A New York Criminal lawyer said that the defendant, who had previously been convicted of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree, failed to comply with the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) in violation of Correction Law § 168-t. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
That didn’t end well for Zhu either.There’s definitely one – if not several – points for the CJEU to look at here, if Zhu can muster up the resources to pursue a further appeal and referral. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:21 am
Cárcel. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 12:26 pm
See MGCL § 3-202(c). [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 4:40 pm
In fact, Bill C-30 must be amended to respect privacy rights. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
En el caso de un menor que es atendido por profesionales de la salud cuya función es apoyar la vida, no privarla, que buscan cómo ayudar, no cómo perjudicar, no vamos a encontrar un motivo para cometer el delito, es decir, para encuadrar la conducta típica antijurídica que la ley requiere para que existan el delito y el delincuente. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 2:33 am
These, in essence, are the issues that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been called upon to decide in Austro-Mechana, C-433/20, a pending referral from Austria.IPKat readers interested in all things private copying (who’s not …) will be aware that private copying in the cloud is not an entirely novel issue for the CJEU.A few years ago, in fact, in VCAST, C-265/16 [here] the Court was asked questions relating to reproductions made through… [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:11 am
Therefore, if bank A, bank B and bank C start to move in on the collateral at the same time, bank C wins. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 5:44 am
Last week this blog reported on the latest addition to the copyright collection of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), this being the decision in Case C-117/13 Technische Universität Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG.In this case the Court ruled that Article 5(3)(n) of the InfoSoc Directive, read in conjunction with Article 5(2)(c) of the same directive, must be interpreted as allowing Member States to grant – at certain conditions –… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:33 am
I explore this point in detail in my recent 230(c)(2) article. 230(c)(2) can't trump federal constitutional claims, but it should (?) [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:32 pm
B.________ a attesté notamment ce qui suit auprès de C.________: (...). [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
The amendment also allows the Legislature to hold a special session outside the Capitol if the building isn’t available. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
UK courts traditionally say we are still concerned b/c registration is so powerful—trader shouldn’t have to look to a defense to use a descriptive term. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Humira: 5 biosimilars approved, none on the market; some will be entering, but only b/c of patent settlement agreements. 11 years earlier than otherwise might be possible. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
(c)(2) isn’t actually bothering most people [just you wait]; (c)(1) does. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 10:34 am
We treat them as illegitimate b/c of incentives myopia. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:39 am
So, complain to the Dean of your school all you want to raise everyones grades from a B- to a B or a C+ to a B-, it won't help. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
That’s my “C” word in the bankruptcy alphabet. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:37 pm
§ 552(b)(7)(C), “Exemption 7(C)”). [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 5:57 am
They also argued that Article 14 RPBA, referring to Article 12(1)(c) RPBA's four-month response period, should apply.The Patentee further cited T 1961/09, arguing that according to this decision, continuing oral proceedings could only be fair if the intervener made no submissions. [read post]
