Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
9 May 2025, 3:00 am
But after the fall of Roe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
In Ileto v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
This is what parents faced at Uvalde Texas who demanded police do something, or they would. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
” Texas Governor Greg Abbot has used this “invasion” claim to justify open defiance of federal supremacy over control of the national border. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
These areas are (with the year designated a HIFCA) New York and Northern New Jersey – (2000) Los Angeles – (2000) San Juan, Puerto Rico – (2000) The southwest Texas and Arizona/Mexico border – (2000) The northern district of Illinois (Chicago) – (2001) The northern district of California (San Francisco) – (2001) Southern Florida (Miami) – (2003) High Profile Examples/Case Studies In 2006, Charles E. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Police were called to his home in Texas over a possible murder. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
District Court for the Central District of California, Lifoam Industries is required to pay a $450,000 penalty and must vent all of its manufacturing emissions through an air pollution control device. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am
(b) California separately taxes controlled foreign corporations and may not be able to tax GILTI in addition. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm
In the afternoon roundtable, one participant claimed that Hassell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
When the case is anemically weak, and brought for the most part to punish someone for expressing themselves, they’re going to need to avoid California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Texas, and DC courts. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Texas A&M Law School professor Daniel E. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
Institute for Justice (2011): Your summarist is asked by his boss for an opinion on the then-recently-filed case Kerr v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:52 am
California had the highest number of bankruptcy filings in 2022. [read post]
