Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2025, 3:17 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] PFAS Strategic Roadmap: EPA’s Commitments to Action 2021—2024; TSCA Section 8(a)(7) Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances | US EPA [2] Addition of Certain PFAS to the TRI by the National Defense Authorization Act | US EPA; Designation of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) as CERCLA Hazardous Substances | US EPA [3] Trump Executive Orders Tracker | Sheppard Mullin [4] See… [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
State) and Venis' case. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 7:25 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:15 pm
Chamber of Commerce and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:45 am
That sentiment was echoed by the US First Circuit last Friday in Glik v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:39 am
On October 18th, 2011, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice held in Realchemie Nederland BV v Bayer CropScience AG (Case C 406/09) that the Brussels I Regulation applies to fines ordered to ensure compliance with jugdments given in civil and commercial matters. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 10:37 am
The case is State of Texas, Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:30 pm
The first flash point between the UK and the newly empowered court is likely to be its failure to implement the 2005 decision in Hirst v The UK (No.2). [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am
In Hodge and Deery Ltd v HMRC [2022] UKFTT 00157 (TC), the claimants installed ready-to-use, flexible vault burial chambers in cemeteries on behalf of a third party to combat ground contamination from adjacent graves. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
This means that Member States might (though they are not obliged to) “address that dynamic concern by granting rightholders ‘rights to receive fuller information’. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Today, the Second Chamber of the General Court handed over two interesting judgments (cases T-426/11 and T-412/11, Maharishi Foundation Ltd. v OHIM), which provide useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign, as well as on the notion of relevant public, in relation to a word sign whose meaning can be easily understood by consumers residing in different member states, due to its closeness to equivalent expressions in other national languages. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am
These are some of the leading cases the court decided during those three decades: 1940 Chambers v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
(Justice Willett not sitting)State of Texas v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2000, in Chen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:07 am
That's why I absolutely agree with the key lesson from NCAA v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
In 1984, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called Graham v. [read post]
