Search for: "Christian v. State"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 3,742
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
An election law based on the principle of proportional representation so that Egypt can truly become a state of institutions and multiple parties. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Consider the reforms of Solon and then of Cleisthenes in Athens, the outcome of the Social War in Rome, and of course the Reconstruction Amendments, the expansion of the franchise to women, and similar moments in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
Christian Sierra, Jennifer Hansler and Michael Conte report for CNN. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Wash.) in Diemert v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:25 pm
Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:52 pm
I am a born-again Christian and my goal in life is to make life better for as many people as I can, using all my God given abilities. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:15 am
Greene: One of the things I get concerned about with the focus on design is that, like, a state Attorney General is not going to be upset if the design has kids reading a lot of bible verses or tomes about being respectful to your parents. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
My paper versus the other topics: One of these things is not like the others. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito yesterday called the leak of his draft opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:02 pm
“In support of its decision, the court invoked a 1995 Supreme Court case, Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
bit.ly/wVssl2 (Jim Eidelman) Privilege Or Work Product Waivers - bit.ly/xENsqj (Federal Evidence Review) Resolution on 'Pippins' Discovery Nears, Though Debate Continues - bit.ly/zTrmUQ (Evan Koblentz) Review Website Ordered to Close after Defaming and Harassing Lawyers - bit.ly/tV21Ex (Pinsent Masons) Singapore eDiscovery Case Update: Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223 - bit.ly/AcLYYc (Serena Lim) Social Media Gotchas in Court - bit.ly/AlNxmG (Eric… [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
(Notably, Congress did recognize that certain classes of persons, such as Christian Scientists and other religious objectors, would not consume the services, and therefore exempted them.) [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm
HE TOLD A CROWD OF CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES SATURDAY IT SHOULD BE UP TO THE STATES. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Against this background the author discusses, in the context of refusal to supply abuses both in and outside an IP context, the operationalisation of the criterion of harm to consumers (section IV) before concluding (section V). [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
He stated: “In my judgment, the question as to whether a faculty should be granted to remove the organ must be considered on its own merits and it cannot be the case that its disposal is simply a necessary consequence of the construction of a new fire exit. [read post]
