Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 13,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2024, 2:00 am
Novak of the Lancaster, PA office of Fowler, Hirtzel, McNulty & Spaulding, LLC for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
In Ibrahim v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:39 am
In Amanda Foster v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:23 am
Individuals performing services for a public employer may be designated "non-employees" by statute Levitt v NYC Office of Collective Bargaining, 273 AD2d 104For the purposes of collective bargaining Article 14 of the Civil Service Law -- the Taylor Law -- applies to all individuals in the services of a public employer except judges, individuals in the military service and public employees designated managerial or confidential. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
On Tuesday the Mississippi Court of Appeals issued a controversial decision in City of Jackson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:48 am
After again ordering Defendant to raise his hands, the officers shot Defendant several times.State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
Swift (Swift & McDonald, PC), Marlo P Cadeddu (Law Office of Marlo P Cadeddu)Court Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionCourt Type: Federal The U.S. government filed three indictments, consisting of seventeen charges, against Barrett Brown, an independent journalist. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:04 am
Read-the-whole-case rating: 2 unless you'd like to read a good example of how administrative law appeals are handled in the post-Dunsmuir era.R. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:29 am
In AmBuild Company, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 1:57 pm
This is a welcome shift, since thousands of applications have been held captive in the Office in the wake of Supreme Court decisions culminating in Alice v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:14 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit] has refused to extend its applicability to private residences per its holding in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
According to this Court:`To accomplish the purpose of [probation], an exceptional degree of flexibility in administration is essential. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:38 pm
Doherty v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 12:29 pm
In contrast, the Justice Department during the eight years of the Obama administration sought extraordinary relief from the court exactly once — a petition for certiorari before judgment in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in Rothgery v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:02 pm
By my count, the Court issued ten published opinions in administrative law cases last month. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:27 am
I was directed to Stein v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” Yesterday the court also agreed to review a case from last week’s conference, Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:01 am
Education Law §3020-a(5) provides that "[n]ot later than ten days after receipt of the hearing officer's decision, the employee . . . may make an application to the New York State Supreme Court to vacate or modify the decision of the hearing officer pursuant to [CPLR 7511]. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:08 pm
Office of Personnel Management (District Court docket 10-257). [read post]
