Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 3661 - 3680 of 16,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
  The factors a Data Controller in Google’s position are required to consider were considered and discussed by the English High Court in NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) (see our blog here). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:02 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Cross-examination by defense — Relevance Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Tyerria Clea, appellant, was convicted of robbery, second-degree assault, and theft of property with a value of less than $1,000. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:56 am by R. David Donoghue
I am cross-posting because Anthony’s post is about a Judge Durkin 101 opinion in FYF-JB, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:56 am by R. David Donoghue
I am cross-posting because Anthony’s post is about a Judge Durkin 101 opinion in FYF-JB, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:11 am by Andrew Keane Woods
This is consistent with the thinking by the Canadian Supreme Court, which upheld a global injunction in 2017 in Google v Equustek. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Teranet Inc., 2019 SCC 43 https://t.co/axiw1P1OBr 2019-09-26 When copyright in a work transfers to the Crown: Keatley v Teranet https://t.co/YsjJlyeVke 2019-09-26 Anti-suit injunction proceeding in cross broader software copyright dispute Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [… https://t.co/2Jx00sQAq0 2019-09-27 Moral Rights in Canadian Copyright Law https://t.co/Pg2KH1tfQo 2019-09-27 New law for music industry https://t.co/wGaG3Wu2wq 2019-09-27 Claim for… [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
No work of any kind may cross an exact vertical projection of this property line, above or below ground as noted in Anderson v. [read post]