Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
The Hill: “Businesses have a responsibility, too,” said Obama in his weekly address on Saturday. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:21 am
Rev. 1409 (1993) - in which Professor Green criticized the dominant view of corporate governance, according to which directors have a fiduciary duty to maximize shareholder wealth. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
As a result, choice of law and jurisdiction rules potentially expose firms that do business nationally or internationally to oppressive law in any of the US states. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 12:42 pm
In R. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Christopher Domin (Student author). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
Perhaps the challenge was better put by Dominic Raab (Esher and Walton) (Con): Strasbourg is not only checking Governments but rewriting laws written by elected lawmakers. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
The RecordTV v MediaCorp TV Singapore (2010) case was cited. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
(Follow the links for Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV.) [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:16 am
In March, the Supremes will hear arguments in the Dukes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm
Moreover, “state insurance department staff levels declined 11% in 2007 while premium volume increased 12%. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:25 am
Stoncor Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:14 pm
On Tuesday, in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
In Indian society, a male spouse enjoyed the position of dominance for centuries together. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 8:05 pm
Haynes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
In any event, big business does not want independent inventors, small businesses or well funded start-ups to enjoy strong patent protection because that threatens their dominance. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:10 am
In Bravo v. [read post]
