Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 8,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
The Polis blog has a piece by Charlie Beckett “What does the Brooks Coulson phone-hacking verdict tell us about editors’ responsibility for their newsrooms? [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
It should be added that article 24-4 of the Brussels I Bis Regulation does not apply in the context of a provisional proceeding as long as the court seized does not rule on the validity of the right and it seems valid. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:40 pm
The Court stressed that “[a]lthough parties may contractually agree to undertake a separate obligation, the breach of which does not arise until some future date, the repurchase obligation undertaken by [defendant] does not fit this description. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:41 am
These are, in substance, exemplary damages – the defendant does not have to demonstrate any loss or damage or even actual abusive conduct. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:01 am
G.S. 20-141.4(a2). [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:01 am
G.S. 20-141.4(a2). [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 3:19 am
Apr. 25, 2008), the plaintiffs, representing a putative class of credit cardholders, sued 20 of the largest issuing banks under section 1 of the Sherman Act for conspiring to use arbitration clauses that prohibit class actions. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:55 pm
On September 9, 2011, the court adjourned the case to October 20, 2011 for decision. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 10:26 am
” The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Under that formula, where, as here, the parties are married for 20 years, the duration can be set at between 30–40% of the term – which would allow a maximum duration of eight years. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm
The elements of breach of contract are: "(1) a valid contract; (2) the plaintiff performed or tendered performance; (3) the defendant breached the contract; and (4) the plaintiff was damaged as a result of the breach. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
What Does “Bail” Mean? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm
Defendant was charged with eavesdropping, (720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)(1), and using or divulging information obtained through the use of an eavesdropping device, 720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)(3). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Mar. 1, 2018, no pet.) [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:54 am
As more concisely summarized in State Farm, these "guideposts" are: "(1) the degree of reprehensibility of the defendant's misconduct; (2) the disparity between the actual or potential harm suffered by the plaintiff and the punitive damages award; and (3) the difference between the punitive damages awarded by the jury and the civil penalties authorized or imposed in comparable cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
On one level, much of the legal work is the same—I still spend about 80-90% of my time defending criminal cases (the other 10-20% is spent on the civil side of juvenile law). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:58 pm
Kelly (1995), 20 B.C.L.R. (3d) 232 (S.C.). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(B). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:13 am
” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(B). [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:02 am
II), 2021 WL 3878654, No. 20-15742 (9th Cir. [read post]