Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2018, 4:40 am
According to the Stockholm Administrative Court (and this is probably the most interesting aspect of the judgment) Article 4(1) of the Data Protection Directive – together with the decision in Google Spain – does not support such a possibility. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:31 am
., at 1 (C.D. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:16 pm
” Interestingly, however, the statute does not say “valid prescription. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 12:00 am
How does one obtain an in camera interview? [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:24 pm
Does the firm have the proper staffing profile for the work it does? [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 4:56 am
In 2020, the ratio was 351 to 1. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 7:10 am
" '707 Patent at col. 29, l. 53 - col. 30, l. 14.Dependent Claim 2"The exchange according to claim 1, wherein processor means further comprises means for matching the remaining portion with professional orders or quotations in the book memory means on a pro rata basis." [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
., May 29, 2009), read opinion here. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 10:10 am
The case is Jane Doe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm
Introduction 1. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
” Dixon cited to 10 U.S.C. 949j(a)(1), which incorporates Article III standards, including the Due Process Clause, into the military commissions. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
On 29 June 2015 Mr Haedicke filed (first) observations under Article 115 EPC regarding the retroactive transferability of a priority right (D22).IX. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm
One of them considers the ‘appropriate court’ ground for service out of jurisdiction provided in Order 8 rule 1(1) and touches on the location of cryptoassets; the other is on Order 8 rule 1(3). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
The court says in a footnote that “Ironically, a newspaper could face no liability under § 6254.21(c)(1) for publishing in print the same information that it posts online. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
1. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:34 am
” (Fairley Dep., Page 58 (lines 1-2, 7), Page 61 (lines 13-14), Page 62 (lines 4-5)) That doesn’t look particularly kosher. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 6:18 am
” The Act does not state that benchers are to bow to the wishes of those who elected them, nor to the wishes of other legal stakeholders. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 6:18 am
The Act does not state that benchers are to bow to the wishes of those who elected them, nor to the wishes of other legal stakeholders. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:11 am
(Google+) bit.ly/xMcCN8 (@OrangeLT) 2012 eDiscovery Events JANUARY LegalTech New York 2012 January 30 - February 1, 2012 New York, NY 8th Annual Law Firm Chief Information & Technology Officers Forum January 31 - February 1, 2012 New York, NY MARCH LegalIT Business Show March 6 - 7, 2012 London, UK IP Counsel Forum March 7 - 8, 2012 San Jose, CA AIIM 2012 Conference March 20 - 22, 2012 San Francisco, CA The Sedona Conference Institute's 6th Annual Program on… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
Although this determination “is most often perfunctory and selfevident, the guiding standard is whether a restraining order is necessary, upon an evaluation of the factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:25-29(a)(1) to -29(a)(6), to protect the victim from an immediate danger or to prevent further abuse. [read post]
