Search for: "Does 1 - 47" Results 3661 - 3680 of 4,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
" If the right to decide belongs to the shareholders, however, what relevance does the board's motives have? [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 2:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm by Dan Pinnington
Hopkinson Estate, (2000) 47 O.R. (3d) 370 (Ont.C.A.)). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
A substantially similar version of this article was initially published in Issue No. 1 2012 of the Business Law News of the California State Bar. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
              The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14]  Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm by Graham Purse
A tax system brings individual interests into conflict with collective interests.1 Should a person, therefore, have to subvert his own interest? [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:07 am by Gregory McNeal
As an example, in the paper I describe how CENTCOM data indicates that less than 1% of targeted killing operations resulted in harm to civilians, whereas outside observers estimate that 8%-47% of CIA strikes in Pakistan inflicted harm to civilians. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am by MBettman
Garner, 47 US. 1 (1985) (“[t]he use of deadly force to prevent the escape of felony suspects, whatever the circumstances, is constitutionally unreasonable… Where the suspect poses no immediate threat to the officer and no threat to others, the harm resulting from failing to apprehend him does not justify the use of deadly force to do so. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:09 pm
Nevada does not ask for the names of company shareholders, nor does it routinely share the little information it has with the federal government. [read post]