Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
(p. 43) The question of jurisdiction is not, in fact, as clear as this quote suggests and I have looked at the matter in some detail here. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:23 am
In no. 2, I liked a) data subject for Betroffene(r) (No. 1 had affected party - I was going to use person affected, although I see I had already got data subject in my database) b) Bußgeldvorschriften and Strafvorschriften, as headings, translated as Administrative offences and Criminal offences (No. 1 had Administrative Fine Provisions and Penalty Provisions) c) Translation of section 43 (5): entgegen § 29 Abs. 2 Satz 3 oder 4 die dort bezeichneten… [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 12:32 am
LEXIS 116648, at *43 (emphasis added). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm
As of March 1, there were nearly 63,000 persons on Texas' public database administered by the state's Department of Public Safety, which adds roughly 100 new names to the list each week. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:12 pm
Brunson, 59 M.J. 41, 43 (C.A.A.F. 2003). [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:25 am
Sidenote: PERA often leads to confusion on two fronts - 1. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 12:05 pm
Under N.J.S. 2C:5-1, “a person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if, acting with the kind of culpability otherwise required for commission of the crime, he: (1) Purposely engages in conduct which would constitute the crime if the attendant circumstances were as a reasonable person would believe them to be; (2) When causing a particular result is an element of the crime, does or omits to do anything with the purpose of causing such result without further… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:53 am
Thereafter it does not appear the plaintiff saw Dr. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
But there was a law passed in 1999 called the Wireless Communication and Public Safety Act of 1999 that authorized the deployment of a nation-wide 9–1-1 emergency service for wireless phone users, called “Enhanced 9–1-1. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:59 pm
Does she really do that on her show? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:41 pm
Pervaz, 118 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.1997). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:42 am
LEXIS 291 at *1. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
§ 112, ¶1. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:30 am
In the case of Attorney-General v X and Others 1992 1 [IR] 1 the Supreme Court held that the constitutional prohibition on abortion contained in Article 40.3.3. of the Constitution was not absolute. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
BELL From January 2007 to June 2007, Jane Doe worked for an answering service in Temecula. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:20 pm
Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 66 (1997). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Arizona, 520 U.S. 43, 67, 117 S.Ct. 1055, 137 L.Ed.2d 170 (1997).As official proponents under California law, proponents organized the successful campaign for Proposition 8. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
If the patient does not have a living related donor for their first kidney transplant and when they need a second kidney transplant after loss of the first transplant, they will need dialysis until a subsequent transplant can be performed. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:58 am
§ 2702(a)(1). [read post]
