Search for: "English v. English" Results 3661 - 3680 of 11,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 6:44 pm
Justices Breyer and Scalia went at it today during oral arguments in Horne v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:57 pm
On March 17, the Second District Court of Appeal issued another strong decision for employees in Sanchez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:56 pm by INFORRM
The article concerned a Mr Andrew Johns, an Australian Rugby League player who had expressed a desire to play a game for an English football club, thereby generating a public debate about the propriety of doing so and about his commitment to his own team, the Kangaroos. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
 This closely corresponds to the position laid down in the various English broadcasting codes and in the IPSO Editors Code of Practice (clause 10). [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 17 May 2019, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors ([2019] EWCA Civ 852). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The article offers six reasons why something akin to juristische Methodenlehre  has never taken off in English law: (i) when legal methodology was refined and developed in 19th  century Germany, English law was facing very different problems and only saw the beginnings of university education; (ii) unlike in Germany, legal methodology has never been a compulsory element of legal education; (iii) employers, whose professional organizations still determine the compulsory… [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:19 am by Chukwuma Okoli
  This rule as applied in Nigeria  –  often referred to as the  Mocambique  rule  –  is derived from the English case of British South Africa Company v Companhia de Mocambique [1893] AC 602. [read post]
23 May 2021, 10:09 am by INFORRM
MailOnline’s position that an expectation of privacy was extinguished by the fact of publication elsewhere was unsustainable, particularly in the light of the recent decision in Sicri v Associated Newspapers Ltd. [read post]