Search for: "Express Services Inc" Results 3661 - 3680 of 6,134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Wallis, MD Florida 2013http://t.co/7psHtlPOaz -> TRO granted to prevent open sourcing of infringing software BATTELLE ENERGY v SOUTHFORK SECURITY Idaho 2013http://t.co/b68D3Uw6mY -> Hosting agreement terminated for customer spamming AHOSTING, INC. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
” Only one statute, the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (commonly known as “the Federal Procurement Act”), might allow the Presidential authority for EO 11246, Copus said. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:20 pm
The customers' express consent is now required before rental companies can install spyware on their computers. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 9:02 pm by Anita Ramasastry
In late September 2013, the FTC reached a settlement and levied a $1 million fine against two related California-based firms: National Attorney Collection Services Inc., and National Attorney Services LLC. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
Request for Unpleaded Relief Matter of McCoun (Railroad Bagel Express, Inc.), Short Form Order, Index No. 11-24578 (Sup Ct Suffolk County July 17, 2013) (Thomas F. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:39 pm by Geoff Cockrell
The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/SpjGYT8gDX -> Facebook fan page creators escape German privacy law | PCWorld – http://t.co/SiKTPZBiL0 -> Obamacare website glitches linked to Canadian IT firm CGI http://t.co/kITUonbaBQ -> Connecting… – http://t.co/QMKprx673N -> Internet Defamation claim no violation of freedom of expression DELFI AS v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Duets Guest Blogger
and another for “Cotweet” filed by Launchability, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:57 am by Amber Walsh
 The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:41 pm by Orin Kerr
This is just an expression of the traditional distinction between fraud in the inducement and fraud in the factum generally taught in first-year criminal law courses. [read post]