Search for: "Florida v. Wells"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 6,313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2024, 10:26 pm
So far, ten deaths have been reported, including one in Illinois, one in New Jersey, one in New York, one in Virginia, one in Florida, one in Tennessee, one in New Mexico, one in New York, and two in South Carolina. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:33 am
Satterfield v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:34 pm
Well, today threw me for quite a loop. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
[We’re pleased to have another outstanding guest post by Stephen Carlisle, an entertainment lawyer with over 25 years experience in private practice in the State of Florida. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Well readers, it’s come and gone. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:34 pm
NPS LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:20 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:06 pm
Council v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:19 pm
The controlling statutory law is N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 and the precedential case in the state of NJ is Baures v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am
This was the argument that swayed the 5th Circuit in the BNSF case and the Florida district court in the CSX case, both of which explicitly followed the two-step deference framework of Chevron, U.S.A. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
Florida says equitable tolling should never be allowed. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida his “favorite case of the term. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 9:35 am
” Of course, oysters are grown and eaten raw in other parts of the country – and have been linked to vibrio vulnificus illnesses as well – at least twice – 2006 and 2009 – from the State of Washingon. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
See Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
SUPPLEMENTAL EARNINGS CLAIMS 18 V. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Politano, No. 06-2342 Sentence above the guidelines range for engaging in a business of dealing firearms without a license is affirmed where the district court: 1) acted well within its discretion in finding defendant's likelihood of recidivism was underestimated in the sentencing guidelines; and 2) properly considered the seriousness of the crime, need for deterrence, and defendant's likelihood of recidivism within its discussion of section 3553(a) sentencing factors. . [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am
” Cunningham (as well as several other Florida defendants convicted by a six-person jury) came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to take up her case and consider whether to overrule Williams. [read post]
