Search for: "Gaines v. State" Results 3661 - 3680 of 9,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2012, 6:53 pm by John W. Arden
He gained a great deal of attention recently when he submitted an amicus filing concerning the proposed final judgment in comic form. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
From In Custodia Legis (the blog of the Law Librarians of Congress): "Witchcraft and a Haunted Case of Torture in Joost de Damhouder’s Praxis Rerum Criminalium (1555)"; How a House Becomes Legally Haunted: Stambovsky v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 12:26 am by Florian Mueller
For that reason, another German court, the Düsseldorf Regional Court, stayed a Huawei v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
To be struck down, the law must violate a provision of the applicable Federal or state Constitution.A recent example of this principle showed up in Fite v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 10:15 am by John Jascob
Even if cooperative and engaged in remedial efforts, a defendant or respondent should not be allowed to retain ill-gotten gains. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:42 am by John Jascob
The CFTC did not show that the district court had abused its discretion in declining to order restitution (CFTC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:43 am by John Jascob
The Topps acquisition will necessarily dilute the public stockholders, meaning that they only gain if the merger is sufficiently valuable to make up for that dilution. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
In the critical passage, the court notes:"In the employment context, if knowledge and opportunity suffice for a prima facie case of misappropriation, then an employer can state a prima facie case against its employee merely by showing that it gave the employee access to its trade secrets. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:57 am by John Jascob
The Commission rejected the respondents’ appeal based on the recent Tenth Circuit case Bandimere v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
” For instance, VStock only gained a nominal fee of at most $200 for the transaction. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:30 am by David Clark
Companies with such concerns received a bit of reassurance in a January 21, 2014 opinion and order in Rick Bonds v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Unknown
Knowing that Brookfield expected to gain $130 million in management fees would have helped stockholders evaluate whether Brookfield paid a fair price and whether the special committee leveraged the added value.The case is No. 241, 2023. [read post]