Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 7,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am
“He’s so evil that he makes Hitler look good. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:41 pm
" (Emphasis added.) - Dunn NW v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
" One year later, the good news is that this frightening beast, more formally known as Conte v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 4:03 pm
Chee v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:43 am
They lost in the Supreme Court last year in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
Green v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
Green v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 3:06 am
In 2016, the Court received an original jurisdiction lawsuit, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Minnesota is a good place to be an ADA defendant, though the money wasted on lawyers could certainly have been better spent. [read post]
25 May 2014, 2:10 am
The Court reviewed Beard v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
According to this criticism, when the state sentences a former felon to 25 years in prison for stealing three golf clubs, see Ewing v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:35 pm
[Popsquire] Sponsored Topics: Nancy Pelosi - Government - United States - California - US House of Representatives [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
As the Court of Appeal stated in Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Company v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 7:25 am
The Ohio Supreme Court in its decision, Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
"Cell phone users have an expectation of privacy in their cell phone location in real time and that society is prepared to recognize that expectation as reasonable," Judge Hamilton wrote, citing an important Supreme Court decision from 1967 known as United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Brnovich v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:40 pm
Co. of Am. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Hinojosa 15-833Issue: (1) Whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s presumption that a state decision rejecting a claim is a ruling on the merits can be rebutted by looking through to an earlier state ruling which applied a procedural bar that, under state law, could not be the basis for the later decision; and (2) whether, if so, a change in state law reducing a prisoner’s ability to earn future good-time credits based on… [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
