Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 5,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 5:03 pm
McDonald, managing member, and Richard V. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
In another he lost an arm; but though he had but one eye and one arm, he was always the first in the fight and the last out. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm
A simple question, perhaps, but one the Court is poised to decide in Sandifer v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
He does not enter office with a presumption that as President he will pursue a vision of what national security means that is remotely related to my own or that he will do so in a rational fashion—or even that he and I share a common idea of what aspects of this nation we are trying to secure. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:40 am
The justices finished up the first week of the new term by finally hearing argument in Google v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm
Stern, a California lawyer; no dice, said the district court in Stern v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
Background and questions referred As is well-known, Oracle has not only been busy in various courts recently (eg with the Oracle v Google saga), but is also a software house, which develops and markets computer software. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:17 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:00 am
It was irrelevant at what time he would have made those trials. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:44 am
This reality has created practical problems in dealing with holders of low-quality patents who seek large damage awards. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Justice Stevens told Barnes that he hoped that his earlier comment (to Jeffrey Toobin of the New Yorker) that he would decide on his plans for next year within thirty days “wasn’t being treated as a statute of limitations,” and he repeated that he would surely retire while President Obama was still in office. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm
United States and its progeny Debs v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm
A recent case that comes to mind is Holder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
Right holders have the option of putting such content behind a paywall or applying other technological restrictions if they wish to control access to it." [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:17 am
One case currently being litigated, Caner v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
A: he doesn’t know. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
In Binder v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 2:08 pm
He argued that every sentence in the statute matters. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
In Bourne Co. v. [read post]
