Search for: "Head v. The University"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 3,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2007, 4:03 pm
The only IP action this week on the Curia agenda is Case T-460/05 Bang & Olufsen v OHIM, an appeal to the Court of First Instance against OHIM's refusal to register as a Community trade mark an "haut parleur", which even the Kat can translate into a loudspeaker. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 7:17 am
Please note: I am updating this post as comments are received, so check back for updates. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 1:02 am
Mardjetko v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:18 am
In the essay, Peter acknowledges that he is regularly regarded with suspicion from lefties (he has criticized the critics of Bush v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 8:34 pm
Thanks to Jonathan Adler for the heads up and the wrap-up reminder. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 11:50 am
Judit Bar-Ilan (Bar-Ilan University Information Sciences Department), PageRank v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
In repayment the mummers were expected to entertain before they headed out for the next house.Very rarely you would hear reports of a 'Lone Mummer' appearing in a remote community as it was hard to imagine anyone undertaking such a visit alone in the dead of winter. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 11:23 am
Owen of the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas Law School, has told the Court of the Fifth Circuit's 9-7 en banc ruling on Dec. 11 in the case of Nelson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
ESTAuburn Tigers (10) v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 4:39 am
The group is headed by Brad Sherman of Sherman and Bentley fame .... [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
ESTNorthern Illinois Huskies v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 6:37 pm
"Despite the fact that Gideon v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
Following Taylor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 3:17 am
"Interesting that Universal's suit, as here quoted, does not mention the weasel word "inducement", as their attack must surely be based on MGM v Grokster and its new test for third party copyright infringement. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
As a Social Darwinist, this author traditionally supports such bull-headed displays of freedom, as the gene-pool is likely better off without such people treading water. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 7:36 am
The suit that Quindlen is probably referring to, Frank v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 12:53 pm
Here is the abstract:A recent case, Murphy v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 11:36 am
I suggest that Roper v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 11:55 am
Mark Rahdert (Temple University - James E. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 10:10 pm
Eric also cites a recent case from the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Ohio where the court reached the same conclusion as in the Axciom case (Key v. [read post]
