Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 3661 - 3680 of 7,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Question 118.08 Question: Instruction 5 to Item 402(b) provides that “[d]isclosure of target levels that are non-GAAP financial measures will not be subject to Regulation G and Item 10(e); however, disclosure must be provided as to how the number is calculated from the registrant’s audited financial statements. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to subscribe@taberlaw.com with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm by David
Re-reckon them figgers: The neutral pronunciation occurs for very few syllables, so let's bracket that one out. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:23 pm by Ronald Mann
… Actually, it’s like you’re appointing a surrogate and you’re saying, you do it for me, but you do it. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:02 pm by admin
See In re Mac Donald, 755 F.2d at 717; In re Holtkamp, 669 F.2d 505, 508-09 (7th Cir.1982); In re Revco D.S., Inc., 99 B.R. 768, 776-77 (N.D.Ohio 1989); In re Pro Football Weekly, Inc., 60 B.R. 824, 826-27 (N.D.Ill.1986); Broadhurst v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:26 pm by Evan Lohr
So he said he would let me in under that program after three years if I would take two courses that summer and make a B or better in them and make a modest score on the LSAT. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:26 pm by Evan Lohr
So he said he would let me in under that program after three years if I would take two courses that summer and make a B or better in them and make a modest score on the LSAT. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:45 am by Juana Vasella
Das Bundesgericht definiert „überspitzen Formalismus“ wie folgt: 2.2 Überspitzter Formalismus als besondere Form der Rechtsverweigerung ist gegeben, wenn für ein Verfahren rigorose Formvorschriften aufgestellt werden, ohne dass die Strenge sachlich gerechtfertigt wäre, wenn die Behörde formelle Vorschriften mit übertriebener Schärfe handhabt oder an Rechtsschriften überspannte Anforderungen stellt und damit dem Bürger den… [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
Plaintiffs-appellants Pebble Limited Partnership and Alaska Peninsula Corporation appeal from the district court's order dismissing their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Section 9.10(2)(e) states: (e) An individual signature on a petition sheet may not be counted if: 1. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:50 pm by Peter Rost
All Documents are provided on a non-exclusive license basis only for your personal one-time use for non-commercial purposes, without any right to re-license, sublicense, distribute, assign or transfer such license. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
Pylon: Jettisoning the presumption of irreparable harm in injunction relief (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC: BPAI’s ex parte decision based upon new factual findings constitutes a new ground of rejection: In re Stepan Co. [read post]