Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS" Results 3661 - 3680 of 7,539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
  Lisa Daniels summarized In re Search Warrant No. 16-960-M-01 to Google. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 6:46 am by Elena Chachko
The Regularization Law does not overturn the Ofra court order, nor can it re-build Amona. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lynch, 803 F.3d 1165 (10th Cir. 2015) (wrote opinion) Decision of Board of Immigration Appeals inIn re Briones did not apply retroactively to bar alien’s application for adjustment of status. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Following a decision taken on 14 October 2015, the Enlarged Board invited the President of the European Patent Office to comment on the points of law referred to it by the technical board and placed an announcement in the Official Journal of the European Patent Office to give third parties the opportunity to express their views on the points referred.IV. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
The official position of the president is that everything went great this weekend in the Immigration Executive Order. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 7:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
In the broader sense, however, it is most emphatically not good news to have a White House that just makes decisions with no serious thought or interagency input into what those decisions might mean. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 10:28 am by Jordan Brunner
Paul also explored the implications of Trump’s executive order on “Enhancing Public Safety” on the Privacy Shield agreement. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent op-ed, Harvard Law School professor Cass R. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 9:00 am by Edward Smith
Reducing Vallejo Pedestrian Accidents I’m Ed Smith, a Vallejo car accident lawyer. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
Thus, it would be unlikely for the relevant public to recognize such figure element as Michael Jordan. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Daniel Byman
It is right for Trump and his senior officials to ask “so what? [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
I thought that Article III standing was a prerequisite for an appellate decision as well. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:14 am by Benjamin Wittes
If you’re not one of those people, have a little humility about how much outrage to gin up now. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 12:00 am by Hunter Biederman
It re-presented all cases heard by this grand jury to the new grand jury, achieving no substantial difference in the decisions. [read post]