Search for: "In Re Kennedy"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2009, 2:12 pm
We’re not base anarchists. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:48 pm
Just consider the spaghetti bowl of inconsistent Supreme Court decisions on whether there is a constitutional right to trade in liquor or if it is res extra commercium. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:31 am
Kennedy and Ben Bradlee, were chosen for showing particular promise. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:02 pm
Kennedy 1. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:30 pm
Hey, we're just getting started! [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
Bacon famously says:"You're investing in steam control. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
And mostly, of course, we're right. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 6:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy and Sam Alito will head to Austria for part of the summer; Chief Justice Roberts will do a teach a course in Ireland; and Ruth Bader Ginsburg is slated to do the same in Rome. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:11 am
Here are a few of my takeaways from this case: Anyone still think we're "post-racial"? [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:07 am
I'd put even odds on whether the Supreme Court would extend habeas rights to Bagram, depending largely on the facts of the particular case, and what Justice Kennedy has for breakfast that day. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:15 am
Justice Kennedy fears that lack of a clear definition of what witnesses we're talking about could grind the criminal justice system to a halt. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:23 pm
But the moral is probably a narrower one: If you're going to shaft white applicants, don't be as blatant about it as New Haven was. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:40 am
You look like you're out of Central Casting. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
It reasoned that “[e]videntiary support for the conclu-sion that remedial action is warranted becomes crucial when the re-medial program is challenged in court by nonminority employees. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:50 am
Congress could have re-passed parts of the affected statutes, but this would not necessarily cure the constitutional defects in the Court's eyes. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:58 am
Though Kennedy ultimately had to go public with the story, we’re all still here, so the 7-day media blackout had to have helped. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
Here's the crisis issue, they're trying to pack the courts with Federalists. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 1:06 pm
Sixty percent of them don't cover insurance, so 60% of 72% of the jobs have a new cost, which means we're going to fire people because we won't be able to afford that. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm
They’re usually nothing more than a quick buck and a cheap laugh, the faint shadow of what we enjoyed so much the first time around. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
See SCOTUSBlog coverage here and opinion here.I think CAAF will need to re-look at the rule in United States v. [read post]
