Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 3661 - 3680
of 62,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2020, 7:33 am
Torts — Premises liability — Res ipsa loquitor This appeal arises following a judgment entered in favor of Ms. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:26 pm
Did the circuit court err in granting summary judgment in favor of the Association on counts two, three, and four on the ground of res judicata? [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 1:55 pm
At this point, we're straight up dismissing criminal cases for routinely failing to bring 'em to trial within the statutory deadline, and the Court of Appeal today affirms that decision for 44 different defendants.We really, really need more judges out there. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 11:51 am
"When you're Chase Manhattan Bank, and you refi a loan, make sure you record the deed of trust. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:51 am
Amusing story with bits of cross-cultural illumination: Call them stretch jeans, jeggings, ex-girlfriend jeans or what not - we're talking about men in tights. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 5:53 am
We are asked to consider whether appellant’s civil action, filed within the one-year statute of limitations, but later voluntarily dismissed following appellees’ removal of the case from state to federal court, can be re-filed in the state and escape the bar of the statute of limitations. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:06 am
Civil litigation — Telephone Consumer Protection Act — Res judicata Michael Worsham, appellant, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court for Harford County, dismissing his action, which alleged violations of the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Even when you're not able to entirely solve them all the time. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:45 pm
The attorney is entitled to the res (i.e., the fee award). [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:45 pm
I know we're still fresh off the Judge (now Justice) Kavanaugh stuff, and nerves of some on this issue may well still be raw.But ponder for a moment what you thought of the allegations in that matter. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 8:46 pm
Consider the 2007 Federal Circuit decision of In re Nuijten as the standard... [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
Just because you have Erwin Chemerinsky representing you doesn't mean that you're going to win your habeas appeal. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:19 am
Who's going to agree to serve as a receiver when you're (not) paid like this? [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:32 pm
Even if you're the first one to break the sound barrier, that doesn't permit you to submit an affidavit in opposition to a motion for summary judgment in which you suddenly (and inexplicably) "remember" all the things that you repeatedly "did not recall" during your sworn deposition.We call that a sham affidavit, and it's inadmissible. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 2:08 pm
Munger Tolles, with Gibson Dunn as amici.Not counsel you're used to seeing in criminal cases of this type.Three cheers for pro bono work by big firms.Even when, as here, it's unsuccessful. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:25 pm
This case is unusual if only because you usually don't see someone get sentenced to federal prison for trying to smuggle someone into Mexico.Though if the reason you're trying to smuggle that person into Mexico is because he just shot and killed a police officer in the United States, yeah, that'll get you in trouble for sure. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:01 pm
Today, we learn that even when you're in the Ninth Circuit, you can't even rely upon the Ninth Circuit's own Model Civil Jury Instructions (here, No. 9.25).Is nothing sacred? [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:50 am
Maryland Public Information Act — Action for judicial review — Res judicata The present appeal stems from the 2018 denial of a second Maryland Public Information Act (“MPIA”) request for the disclosure of records submitted by Jamerson Tillman, appellant, to the Prince George’s County Police Department (“the Department”). [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:28 pm
"Jack: "You're a striking figure, yes. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:03 pm
We don't even need to write an opinion.All we need is nine days after the oral argument would otherwise have been scheduled to tell you that we're adopting in full the district court's opinion as our own. [read post]
