Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 5,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2012, 8:47 am
Canada’s new Anti-spam Act will create an “opt-in” regime for commercial electronic marketing and amend the following federal statutes: 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
Canada’s new Anti-spam Act will create an “opt-in” regime for commercial electronic marketing and amend the following federal statutes: 1. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm
Specifically, the Senate version amends the Securities Act so that companies can raise up to $1 million dollars from many individual investors. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
[Page 1:] The plaintiffs, Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and Bluesnap, Inc. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am
Google also gets great rulings on the Fourth Amendment… Attorney General Hood’s subpoena must comport with the requirements of the Fourth Amendment and not wage an unduly burdensome fishing expedition into Google’s operations. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
(Amended Opinion) U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, May 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Designs are protected under the Designs Act 2000, along with the associated Design Rules 2001 and (Amendment) Rules 2008. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
” As an initial matter, the industry argued that the use of advertising to identify what counts as a modified risk product burdened speech in violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 am
” The matter was heard by a hearing examiner, who issued a report and recommendation on June 10, 2014, revoking Capital Care’s license. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am
By the time of the hearing on Wife's motion to alter or amend, Wife had attained full-time employment at the rate of $10 per hour. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
Didn’t matter; all harmless. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Bermudez, No. 06-5119 Conviction for possession of firearm by a felon is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in admitting police testimony as to drug-related statements made by defendant; 2) the use of a "blind strike" method in jury selection was both constitutional and consistent with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 24(b); and 3) comments made during the government's closing arguments were not unfairly prejudicial. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
P. 38.1(k)(1)(C).Failure to file an amended brief that complies with the Texas Rules of AppellateProcedure within 10 days of the date of this letter may result in dismissal of this appealwithout further notice from the Court. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
The provision regarding Attorneys’ Fees found in the existing Emergency Regulations, has been amended in a couple of notable ways. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 11:30 am
The proposed rules include new disclosure requirements with respect to overall compensation policies and their impact on risk-taking, stock and option awards for executives and directors, director and nominee qualifications and legal proceedings, company leadership structure, the board of directors’ role in the risk management process, and potential conflicts of interest of compensation consultants that advise companies. [10] While a number of issues have been… [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:32 am
Levinson in the context of a securities fraud case.[10] It is important to note the context of TSC Industries v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Germany: data protection authorities issue GDPR fining guidelines”. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:44 am
The chairs had been donated from a closed local Methodist Church and introduced under List A Rule 5A (9): “The introduction of free-standing chairs in a church which is not a listed building” [2]. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:00 am
Petitioner also argues that the Fifth Circuit’s approach imposes a premature merits inquiry in violation of Rule 23, violates the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury, and unduly limits securities plaintiffs’ access to the courts. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
The Justices’ willingness to rule on the scope of that Act makes this a serious matter. [read post]
