Search for: "Kennedy v. State" Results 3661 - 3680 of 8,219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am by MBettman
Justice Kennedy’s Dissent Justice Kennedy finds that 4112.01(A)(2) expressly imposes civil liability for discriminatory acts on both the state and its supervisory employees. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, Florida courts, as in Montgomery v State, State v Mason and Smith v State, have held that a nolo contendere plea with adjudication withheld is generally considered a conviction for purposes of determining a defendant's sentence for subsequent convictions. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 10:09 am
Supreme Court in Kennedy, executrix of the estate of Kennedy, deceased v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:51 am by Stefan Passantino
Constitutional in the eyes of Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, Scalia, and Kennedy? [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1975, the Supreme Court in O’Connor v Donaldson held that it was unconstitutional for a state to continue to confine a harmless, mentally ill person. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Rakove sets out to solve in Kennedy, Johnson, and the Nonaligned World is how to explain the remarkable transformation in the relationship between the United States and much of the postcolonial world over the course of the 1960s. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:55 pm
Notice how Kennedy's Hobby Lobby opinion tracks what he wrote in Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:01 pm
By way of illustration, take a look at Sierra Club v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:09 am by Kent Scheidegger
" and so forth, and you may build a compelling case.Polygraph evidence is generally not admissible in court, although in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton weighs in on the events that have followed the Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]