Search for: "Key v State" Results 3661 - 3680 of 22,544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
  On 9 November 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Harpur Trust v Brazel. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am by CMS
Mr Murray held he was bound by the decision in Meguerditchian v Lightbound [1917] 2 KB 298 and the Court of Appeal decision in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1230 that held a lien does not arise where compensation is obtained without the need to issue proceedings. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Here's the key language from the article:In the 1968 case of United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:20 pm
On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) handed down a key ruling that could have a significant impact on franchising across the state. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:43 pm by Ryan Roberts and Ariel E. Debin
As mentioned above, the key takeaway for defense contractors is the impact the Final Rule has on bid protest timeliness with the GAO. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:23 am by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
ShareThe Supreme Court heard argument on Monday in LeDure v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
How can we, centuries later, discern and aggregate the intentions of people who disagreed among themselves about key matters and did not anticipate our circumstances? [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am by Alyson Poole (AU)
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
The key elements were the ‘at any time’ phrasing in the various clauses. [read post]