Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
Janet Lord and Rosemary Kayess led the afternoon session on day 3. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Internet and Social Media The House of Lords Select Committee on Communications have published a report entitled “Growing up with the internet” [pdf] recommending an ambitious programme of digital literacy, minimum standards for those providing internet services and commitment to child-centred design. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am
Our right to free expression has a natural tension with our right to privacy – see Von Hannover, Campbell v MGN or Mosley v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The most recent reference to the law of patents being wholly statutory are the words of Lord Walker in Synthon B.V. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The final version of the ECCTA, which incorporated Lords amendments, received royal assent on October 26, 2023, but it has yet to come into force. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
It states, without any equivocation, that there is "no precedent. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Arnold LJ dissented, considering that the relevant event/state of affairs cannot be overcome by an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
The Bill is currently going through the House of Lords where new amendments are being debated. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
It derives from a case about the chief executive of a large international corporation: Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 295, [2008] QB 103. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 4:59 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Their pages display the search query playback, stating explicitly that no search results for “MTM Special Ops” were found, and list competing products. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:06 am
Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
I have recently dealt in detail with the position under the English law in comparison to the stronger protections in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:55 am
HUBERT No had, my lord! [read post]
