Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2007, 7:56 am
COLORADO STATE RESOURCES AGING Colorado Association of Homes and Services for the Aging 1888 Sherman Street, Suite 610 Denver, CO 80203-1160 Phone: (303) 837-8834 Fax: (303) 837-8836 Aging and Adult Services Department of Social Services 110 16th Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 620-4147; (800) 544-9181 (Toll Free) AARP Colorado State Office 1301 Pennsylvania Street Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 830-2277 Fax: (303) 764-5999 E-mail: coaarp@aarp.org Web:… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
In Hassell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
La Societe Routin (EPLAW) Germany Much ado about kindergarten – debate over use of sheet music in nursery schools (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) India Judicial determination of a ‘well-known’ Indian mark- TATA: Tata Sons Ltd. vs Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Gonzalez, 262 AD2d 281; Silver v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
Copinger (17th ed), [22-18], p 1626, n 94 cites the Hong Kong case of Hksar v Chan Nai Mang (2005), in which it was held that the meaning of “affect prejudicially” was wide in scope and not necessarily restricted to economic prejudice, although that was the obvious area at which the section was directed. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
Touchstone Television Productions v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:24 pm
The language or code, whether verbal, visual, musical or body, is which allows a given individual, communicate with other members of the same community. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
" [U.S. v.] [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Silvers v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:18 am
No case with number can be found on the Curia website, but if you visit the website of the UK's Intellectual Property Office you will find here a notice regarding Case C-228/10 Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) and British Sky Broadcasting Limited v Euroview Sport Ltd. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:52 am
Proctor v. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 3:13 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
