Search for: "People v J."
Results 3661 - 3680
of 7,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm
Mann J rejected this submission, preferring the “layered” approach urged on him by the Claimants. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
The judgment of Hildyard J in Southward Housing Co-Operative Ltd v Walker and Hay [2015] EWHC 1615 (Ch) falls in to the latter category, made all the more odd that it took nearly five months to hand down the decision. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:59 am
Urban Outfitters, Inc., June 4, 2015, Oetken, J.). [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Before Arnold J, it was common ground that the word "for" in claims such as those in the patent were to be understood as "suitable and intended for". [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
But the Supreme Court wrote, in an opinion by Justice William J. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Stocker v Stocker, heard 7 May 2015 (Warby J). [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 1:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:15 pm
Here is the opinion in Leneuoti Tuaua v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:54 am
NSAACLU v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:56 pm
Readers may be getting a slight sense of déjà vu at this point, recalling that another CJEU reference, Case C-351/12 Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, os (OSA) v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně as [noted by Eleonora for the IPKat here], dealt with a similar set of facts involving a health spa. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
Readers may be getting a slight sense of déjà vu at this point, recalling that another CJEU reference, Case C-351/12 Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, os (OSA) v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně as [noted by Eleonora for the IPKat here], dealt with a similar set of facts involving a health spa. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
” Tracomin SA v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:43 am
J. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
Do I have that right, bankruptcy people? [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
In Matthews v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm
In the case of Wilson v Coxon (No.2) ([2015] WASC 197) Kenneth Martin J struck out Burstein particulars pleaded in mitigation by the defendant on the basis that they failed to disclose a reasonably arguable defence. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:28 pm
Devemos estar cientes, também, que o processo de individualização tem sido usado como sinônimo de várias coisas. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:19 pm
Junkins-Hopkins v. [read post]
