Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 3661 - 3680 of 30,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 12:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
Drake, M.D., today (June 24) issued the following statement on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:54 am by Sara Savat
Trust in (young) women of color to lead, innovate in post-Roe world In some ways — like income inequality and the cost of child care — the United States is in a worse situation than when Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:42 am by Jeff Welty
Ever since the Supreme Court of the United State decided NCAA v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:09 pm by Eric Biber
  This approach is not unique to the United States – rights of nature legal approaches have been used in New Zealand, Bolivia, and Ecuador. [read post]
Case date: 06 April 2022 Case number: No. 21-35561 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am by Eleonora Rosati
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:26 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
The United States Supreme Court has also found cognizable similar claims for hostile work environment under Title VII. [read post]
Department of Justice, Elizabeth Prelogar, filed a response in the matter, urging the Supreme Court to decline the relator’s petition for certiorari and arguing that “the FCA is best read to preserve the Executive Branch’s virtually unfettered discretion to dismiss an action brought in the name of the United States to remedy a wrong done to the United States. [read post]