Search for: "S. Sherman"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 5,995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Yesterday’s big news was the Court’s decision to expand the scope of, and order reargument in, Kiobel v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Video replays will be presented in Sherman Oaks on March 21, San Diego on March 22, and Costa Mesa on March 27. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:51 pm
Still okay to violate the Sherman Act? [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
” In reversing the district court’s decision, the Sixth Circuit found the threshold jurisdictional requirement for the Sherman Act was met under the Supreme Court’s “effects test” because Carrier’s complaint alleged that the U.S. market was intertwined with the alleged conspiracy and the conspiracy had an effect on the U.S. market. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:28 am
Here are a few odds and ends that didn't make it into full blog posts in the last few days:Melissa del Bosque at the Texas Observer visits "the deadliest place in Mexico" outside of Juarez and it sounds like the aftermath of Sherman's march.The Burnet County Sheriff wants to reclaim managerial control of the county jail, currently operated by LaSalle Corrections, in the wake of a recent escape. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Sherman Act and agreed to pay a fine of USD $470 million (see: U.S. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:45 am
In Exodus 22:26, it says “If you take your neighbor’s cloak as a pledge, return it to him by sunset, because his cloak is the only covering he has for his body. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Madison’s view is more in line with Brad Sherman’s: depending on where you are in the copyright law, there are different definitions/approaches. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
The Court’s cert. grant in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
” Comments, Questions, Concerns: RIAA CEO Reflects On Responses To His New York Times Op-Ed — The RIAA’s Cary Sherman provides a thoughtful response to those who volunteered their thoughts on his article in the NY Times earlier this month. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:23 am
The 37-year-old man and another man, a 31-year-old from Sherman Oaks, now face charges related to the alleged fraud. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Professor Rory Little summarizes last month’s criminal-law decisions for the American Bar Association’s Criminal Justice Section. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm
Charles.A & L, Licker Law Firm, LLC Main Office & Mailing Address: 1861 Sherman Dr St. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
Lyle Denniston of this blog previews both cases, as does Mark Sherman of the Associated Press. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:40 pm
The charges related to alleged bid-rigging under the Sherman Act on a 2005 contract to refurbish the City of Chicago's garbage carts. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:45 am
The case found its way to the Supreme Court, which ultimately ruled professional baseball did not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
When firms in an industry are players in a repeated game with substantially incomplete and asymmetric information, courts can examine buyer actions to attempt to distinguish between conduct that is an agreement in violation of the Sherman Act and conduct that is not. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:08 am
Ryan Braun’s 50-game suspension overturned by baseball arbitrator Shyam Das - The Washington PostThe Jefferson Parish School Board Association and the Jefferson Federation of Teachers have begun an arbitration hearing before Arbitrator James Sherman concerning the propriety of last years teacher layoffs. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:02 am
The court’s denial of Astellas’ motion to dismiss means that the direct purchasers’ monopolization claims under Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act will proceed The plaintiffs claim that Astellas recognized that generic manufacturers would seek FDA approval to sell competing drugs and that Astellas’ citizen petition was “objectively baseless,” and used “to stall the approval of generic manufacturers’ Abreviated (sic) New Drug… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:13 pm
The court also rejected a claim under Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
