Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 3661 - 3680 of 4,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2013, 9:23 am by Ronald Mann
  The United States suggests that the ADA preempts the implied covenant claim when it is a separate cause of action, but not when it is simply an element of argument on a pure contract claim. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm by Erin Miller
Precisely because Brown has become the crown jewel of the United States Reports, every constitutional theory must claim Brown for itself. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 7:47 pm
United States as a backdrop, the note thoroughly explores whether Justice Alito’s “new textualism” is likely to take hold with other members of the Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 6:59 am by NCC Staff
There are currently two cases at the United States Supreme Court about gerrymandering based on political grounds. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The defendants were convicted and, relying upon its own precedent in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lisa McElroy
United States, one of three cases seeking an interpretation of the federal “honest services” fraud statute. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am by Peter Tillers
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (“it is an old observation that the training of Anglo‐American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legis‐lation”); Parke‐Davis & Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Matt Sundquist
  The Foundry also weighs in, focusing on Thomas’ remarks on the State of the Union speech. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
”  And at the Huffington Post, Brennan Center attorney Monica Youn responds to comments made on the Senate floor last week by Senator Mitch McConnell, who criticized Kagan’s support of the government’s position in Citizens United v. [read post]