Search for: "Seals v. Seals"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 4,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2010, 9:58 am
Tonto is a highly decorated First Air Cavalry Airborne Assault Vietnam Veteran (as memory serves: Silver Star, two Bronze Stars with “V” device for Valor, three Purple Hearts – stabbed, shot, wounded from explosion). [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:19 am
This position echoes the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance in Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
In Thomson v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:22 pm
Totten v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:13 am
Totten v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am
A full Court returned to the question this week in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
(quoting U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:08 am
It is very likely that the Court will decide not to review the first of the new round of petitions: Al-Bihani v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the necessary mechanisms to ensure compliance with the White v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:49 pm
Boler v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 3:45 pm
Navy SEALs 1–26 v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:03 pm
Lumax Industries v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka… [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:41 pm
In Phalp v. [read post]
