Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 3661 - 3680 of 7,410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 1:13 pm by Mark Astarita
" Years later the Supreme Court adopted this misreading, in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:07 am by Jennifer Farer
As we recently discussed, in Liu, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit followed Morrison v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:34 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
A Tax Invader is a foreigner who generates income offshore which they reveal, and on which they pay tax; specifically to the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm by Law Lady
Representation Agreement [and] Sales Management Agreement” wherein Alasko retained Foodmark to market Alasko’s products in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Post has settled a libel claim brought by two individuals who were pictured on the front page with headline the headline “Bag Men: Feds seek duo pictured at Boston Marathon. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:30 pm by Jordan Bublick
  The 11th Circuit previously explained in the case of United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm by Taryn Rucinski
 USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:42 pm by Trey Childress
Australian National Bank, where the Supreme Court concluded that, in considering whether conduct that occurs both inside and outside the United States violates a statute without extraterritorial application, the courts should determine whether the conduct that is the “focus of congressional concern” occurred inside or outside the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:17 am by John Bellinger
Australian National Bank, where the Supreme Court concluded that, in considering whether conduct that occurs both inside and outside the United States violates a statute without extraterritorial application, the courts should determine whether the conduct that is the “focus of congressional concern” occurred inside or outside the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm by Christopher McEachran
Instead, the Second Circuit held that Dodd-Frank does not apply extraterritorially, and because the plaintiff failed to allege that any of the events took place within the United States, Dodd-Frank did not apply. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:30 am by Gene Quinn
Since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. [read post]